|
Post by snakebit on Jan 21, 2017 10:37:57 GMT -7
The number of Democrats that say they will boycott the inauguration has passed 40. Very classy Democrats, very classy. Remember all the haters that boycotted the Obama inauguration? Me neither. As usual your memory is either very short or very biased-
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Jan 16, 2017 19:00:04 GMT -7
I think it's time for a good joke to lighten things up here.
What is the difference between the chick pea and the garbanzo bean...............................................................?
The Orange gropenfuhrer has never has never had a garbanzo bean on his face.
On a more serious note, any opinions on the fact that the National park Service has taken 200 reservations for bus parking on in inauguration day and 1200 reservations for buses bringing protestors to D.C, the day after the inauguration?
P.S. A tip for you Drumph supporters feeling bad about missing the A list celebrity entertainers at the inauguration, come on down to Florida next month. You can catch an inauguration headliner at the Plant City Strawberry Fest*, an event second only to local county fairs in this area. So sad.
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Dec 17, 2016 16:38:08 GMT -7
"Right, and there was a dozen or so women claiming Trump groped and forced himself on them BEFORE the election. Where are they now?" - hoofie They got their 30 pieces of silver and dismissed. I guess you missed the tapes of our lecher in chief basting about sexually assaulting women, right? Or maybe ignoring those sins is how you wingnut xians justify supporting the adulterer in chief.
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Dec 17, 2016 16:13:51 GMT -7
Right, and there was a dozen or so women claiming Trump groped and forced himself on them BEFORE the election. Where are they now? Dems: Comey is trying to win this for Trump! Dems: Comey did the right thing! Dems: Comey is trying to win this for Trump! (Part II) Dems: Comey did the right thing! (Part II) Dems: Fake News! -She’s got Parkinson’s or MS and is covering it up. -She has a body double, whom she trots out when she is too ill to appear in public -She murdered a DNC staffer, among many others -She exchanged “signals” with Lester Holt from the debate stage. -She runs a child pedophilia ring out of pizza parlor in D.C DEMS: Russia is supplying Wikileaks! Ask yourself this question: If the CIA and FBI had evidence of Russian tampering in October, why was nothing said or done until after the election? Nice attempt at deflection hoofie but try to keep up. The story is not about what your "dems" may think it is about what our intelligence services have agreed is true- Putin meddled in our election. However I guess, the FBI, CIA, etc. can't fool you. The U.S. intelligence services must just be partisan stooges making up lies to explain how Clinton seems to have lost the electoral college. Congrats hoofer you and little donnie are too smart to be fooled by all those intelligence pros. Oh, wait, you need to keep up...........Putins little puppet buddy has now changed his story from "never happened" to "Putin did the U.S. a favor and it was good for us to see the hacked info". As for this nonsense "If the CIA and FBI had evidence of Russian tampering in October, why was nothing said or done until after the election?" did you follow any reputable news sources before the election? P.S. Re- false news stories how many of those did you swallow and publicly regurgitate?
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Dec 17, 2016 10:13:02 GMT -7
Consider the source . It's pure BS. What's next? "Trump to add 40 story tower to the White House!" You Supporters of the Orange gropenfuher continue to live in a fact free world.- Putin Involved In Us Hack News Putin himself involved in US election hack: report Putin himself involved in US election hack: report AFP via Yahoo News2 days ago Washington (AFP) - US intelligence officials now believe that Russian President Vladimir Putin was personally involved in hacking during the American election campaign ... Vladimir Putin 'personally involved' in US hack, report claims Vladimir Putin 'personally involved' in US hack, report claims The Guardian3 days ago US intelligence officials believe that Vladimir Putin was personally involved in hacking during the American election campaign as part of a vendetta against Hillary ... Vladimir Putin personally involved in hack of US election, intel officials say: report Vladimir Putin personally involved in hack of US election, intel officials say: report MSN News2 days ago Vladimir Putin personally directed how hacked emails were used in a campaign to interfere with the US election, according to US intelligence officials. More news for Putin Involved In Us Hack U.S. Officials: Putin Personally Involved in U.S. Election Hack -... www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/u-s-officials-putin-personally-... 2 days ago ... U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the ... Putin turned Russia election hacks in Trump's favor: U.S.... www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-cyber-idUSKBN1441RS1 day ago ... Russia election hacks done to help Trump: officials ... VIDEOPutin personally involved in U.S. election hack – NBC · Kremlin says Washington ... White House suggests Putin was involved in US hacking - The ... www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-suggests... 1 day ago ... WASHINGTON — The Obama administration suggested Thursday that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally authorized the hacking o
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Dec 6, 2016 12:52:25 GMT -7
Seems Trump has picked Dr. Ben Carson for Housing and whatever else that title holds. What are your thoughts on that? I'm thinking poor delusional Ben will have us building pyramids just like he believes the Egyptians built for grain storage. They'll be great to improve housing in our inner cities.
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Dec 6, 2016 12:45:32 GMT -7
I find it very humorous that those in the media are pushing the conflict of interest thing, like their buzzards flying over a body waiting for the first drop of blood to hit the pavement. It's like they want him to all of a sudden become poor to be POTUS. But the thing is this. Transitioning into the White House takes time. At the same time transitioning out of Trump Holding takes time. But it just never occurrs to the looser to take him at his word and be patient. And all this crap about his daughter! What do the liberal meat heads want her to do! Disown her father just because she's rich and he the President of the United States? Has a unique ring to it doesn't it. Donald Trump, The President of the United States of America. Hagahahahahahha. I can see liberals all over this county shivering in their shorts when I say that. So far all I see is him appointing a bunch of anti education, anti constitution, White supremacist bigots to his administration along with promised attacks on Medicare and Medicare and tax cuts for the rich. You win jorg, Trump still loves the uneducated "loosers".
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Nov 11, 2016 18:07:56 GMT -7
Wrong again jorg, Secretary Clinton won the the popular vote. She was/is the peoples choice. That said there is no changing the results this year, better to fight to dump the electoral college system. [ Dear Mr Snake. I am not wrong, nor are you. Yes, the popular vote was for Hillary, however, in our system of government the electoral collage makes the decision. They represent the final voice of the People. To ask them to vote otherwise than the system dictates is unethical. Unethical behaviors seems to bother Democrates when Republicans do it but not vice versa. Then it becomes either an entitlement or a right. One more thing. My name is Jorj. Spelling it any other way moving forward will be considered trolling by me and promptly reported. Have a nice day. Again you are wrong, the popular vote obviously reflects the choice of the people. The electoral college vote reflects the vote of the people as filtered through the rules of the electoral college. The electoral college was instituted to give a method where by the electors could overrule the popular vote of the people in case the people voted for someone "manifestly unsuited to be president". This probably won't happen but it could and should in this case. P.S. What is a "democates"? P.PS. One of the few times the Orange bigot was right about anything-
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Nov 11, 2016 6:19:31 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Nov 11, 2016 6:10:04 GMT -7
How very unamerican of you. We have a system in this country that has elected presidents, senetors and representatives to do our bidding for over two hundred years. And now that this election is over, with the results you don't like, you are asking the other who are dissatisfied to tell our elected leaders to ignore the WILL OF THE PEOPLE to cast a vote in your favor! I have news for you. A majority of the states believe, and backed up that belief, that Hillary is the one unfit for the office of President of the United States of America. You have two choices. Either put yourself in a place where your voice can be heard by your elected officials within the ethical guidelines of the Constitution in order to effect positive change or sit back and just bitch about it. At least those two choices would be ethical in that you wouldn't be asking people to ignore the people's choice! Wrong again jorg, Secretary Clinton won the the popular vote. She was/is the peoples choice. That said there is no changing the results this year, better to fight to dump the electoral college system.
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Nov 6, 2016 10:39:06 GMT -7
Mea culpa. I don't know how I (and Yahoo) missed it.
Also, given that it was written in complete sentences and there were no mistakes in spelling or grammar I should have known the "professor" didn't write it.
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Nov 6, 2016 8:24:29 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Nov 5, 2016 17:11:00 GMT -7
Perhaps the anti-Clinton culture is the culture she created while FLOTUS. She was not exactly charming to her Secret Service detail. Link for Snakey-PooThis was dishonestly edited by hoofie misusing his power as moderator to delete my post refuting his lies and pointing out that his "source" is anonymous bs in a supermarket tabloid etc, etc. Finally hoofie has the power he needs to "win". The ability to delete posts he disagrees with. You win, I obviously can't post if you have the power and the lack of fairness and decency to allow you to censor posts that are not violations of the TOS. Loser! P.S. Very fitting that you posted one of those darling, and juvenile, little emoticons as your reason for deleting my words.
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Nov 5, 2016 5:46:16 GMT -7
When unable to refute the facts the uneducated and uninformed often fall back on a logical fallacy. Pretty weak hoofie. Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Read more: tnewsbackupforum.boards.net/thread/638/trump-manchurian-candidate#ixzz4P2j104mTIndeed. It would also be polite to heed your own advice. These articles on 3rd or 4th tier web sites are as credible as the highly paid pundits on the MSM: they have a self serving agenda. Good one hoofie! When trying to defend yourself for resorting to argumentum ad hominem and attacking the messenger it really doesn't make sense to again resort to attacking the messengers as "3rd or 4th tier web sites." What would be polite would be to actually use links to references that refute even one statement from the posted article. If you were capable of that kind of honest, fact based, discussion you wouldn't have to fall back on a logical fallacy to try and defend your first use of logical fallacy. P.S. As long as you want to continue to discuss posts by using argumentum ad hominem I'll respond in kind. Citing Trump, Palin or Tea party sources will prove nothing about your parroted charge of media bias but thanks for throwing it into the discussion. It is very telling.
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Nov 4, 2016 5:38:29 GMT -7
Does that article come with a complimentary tin hat? If not, it should. When unable to refute the facts the uneducated and uninformed often fall back on a logical fallacy. Pretty weak hoofie. Ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.[2] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem Read more: tnewsbackupforum.boards.net/thread/638/trump-manchurian-candidate#ixzz4P2j104mT
|
|