|
Post by ranger06 on Jun 27, 2018 11:19:41 GMT -7
Oh, please! At least give us something that is a bit of a challenge! "Coming the desert"! The Schwartz! Beachcombing.
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Jun 24, 2018 18:56:38 GMT -7
Vaya con Dios, my friend.
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Jun 19, 2018 9:12:43 GMT -7
I'd never get that far because of all the laughing fits I'd have at all the past bad stuff I got away with and all the stuff I didn't.
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Jun 13, 2018 6:03:58 GMT -7
Don't look, I'm dressing.
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Jun 5, 2018 18:15:50 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Jun 4, 2018 17:48:21 GMT -7
Train of thought
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Jun 4, 2018 11:49:15 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on May 24, 2018 8:36:07 GMT -7
You Tube/U tube.
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on May 23, 2018 9:37:51 GMT -7
Nailed "it".
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on May 15, 2018 12:26:09 GMT -7
Stand I Anyone care to guess what the above means? It is fairly easy if you have seen this kind of puzzle before. I understand.
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on May 14, 2018 8:35:49 GMT -7
Sarchasm
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on May 4, 2018 6:45:15 GMT -7
There are worse flogging offences, but not many.
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Apr 30, 2018 14:21:01 GMT -7
I married my tax accountant, so all I do is sign.
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Apr 22, 2018 18:41:03 GMT -7
Then we can talk about SS that is always in threat because the government wants to again help the rich. Placing the cap for SS tax on the people making over 124K (if memory serves me right) has not helped. And yet the poor pay a percentage and the rich could pay that percentage without issue but the burden is placed on the poor and "middle class"? So just threaten is the answer and that is the right wing of politics mainly who does this. Stop kissing the arse of the donors and SS would be fine. Dropping the cap is not the pannacea you seek. It is a double edged sword. From the AARP 2012 article "Argument Against". www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/research/public_policy_institute/econ_sec/2012/option-eliminate-the-payroll-tax-cap-AARP-ppi-econ-sec.pdf"Today, a retiree’s benefits are based only on the income on which he or she pays Social Security payroll taxes. Because of this, in 2012 the maximum Social Security benefit that even the wealthiest American can receive is just over $30,000 a year. If millionaires pay Social Security taxes on all of their salary income, the maximum annual benefit payment could reach over $150,000 a year. This development would not bankrupt the program, but it would change its nature. Social Security was not intended to provide such large benefits. Average benefits could remain at roughly the current level if wealthier Americans paid taxes on their entire salaries, but their benefits remain the same as they are now. Essentially, they would be getting nothing in return for the additional taxes that they would pay. Such a move has been proposed in the past." I make well over the current cap of $128,000. tnewsbackupforum.boards.net/post/11695/quote/921 However, should I claim my SS benefits this year it would be at the income of $128,400, not what I'm actually making. And these 8 reasons give even more cause to pause. www.nationalreview.com/2015/02/eight-reasons-we-shouldnt-raise-cap-social-security-taxes-andrew-biggs/
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Apr 18, 2018 8:26:02 GMT -7
Holiday seasons. Seasons' greeting
|
|