Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2016 22:04:17 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by hoofie on Dec 15, 2016 6:14:43 GMT -7
Consider the source. It's pure BS. What's next? "Trump to add 40 story tower to the White House!"
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Dec 15, 2016 6:27:05 GMT -7
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2016 8:15:29 GMT -7
Putin's name is being brought up often here in the U.S. Is he trying too replace some of the celebritys that said they are leaving if Trump got president?LOL! No telling what is going on behind the curtain?
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Dec 17, 2016 10:13:02 GMT -7
Consider the source . It's pure BS. What's next? "Trump to add 40 story tower to the White House!" You Supporters of the Orange gropenfuher continue to live in a fact free world.- Putin Involved In Us Hack News Putin himself involved in US election hack: report Putin himself involved in US election hack: report AFP via Yahoo News2 days ago Washington (AFP) - US intelligence officials now believe that Russian President Vladimir Putin was personally involved in hacking during the American election campaign ... Vladimir Putin 'personally involved' in US hack, report claims Vladimir Putin 'personally involved' in US hack, report claims The Guardian3 days ago US intelligence officials believe that Vladimir Putin was personally involved in hacking during the American election campaign as part of a vendetta against Hillary ... Vladimir Putin personally involved in hack of US election, intel officials say: report Vladimir Putin personally involved in hack of US election, intel officials say: report MSN News2 days ago Vladimir Putin personally directed how hacked emails were used in a campaign to interfere with the US election, according to US intelligence officials. More news for Putin Involved In Us Hack U.S. Officials: Putin Personally Involved in U.S. Election Hack -... www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/u-s-officials-putin-personally-... 2 days ago ... U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the ... Putin turned Russia election hacks in Trump's favor: U.S.... www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-cyber-idUSKBN1441RS1 day ago ... Russia election hacks done to help Trump: officials ... VIDEOPutin personally involved in U.S. election hack – NBC · Kremlin says Washington ... White House suggests Putin was involved in US hacking - The ... www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-suggests... 1 day ago ... WASHINGTON — The Obama administration suggested Thursday that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally authorized the hacking o
|
|
|
Post by hoofie on Dec 17, 2016 10:45:17 GMT -7
Right, and there was a dozen or so women claiming Trump groped and forced himself on them BEFORE the election. Where are they now? Dems: Comey is trying to win this for Trump! Dems: Comey did the right thing! Dems: Comey is trying to win this for Trump! (Part II) Dems: Comey did the right thing! (Part II) Dems: Fake News! -She’s got Parkinson’s or MS and is covering it up. -She has a body double, whom she trots out when she is too ill to appear in public -She murdered a DNC staffer, among many others -She exchanged “signals” with Lester Holt from the debate stage. -She runs a child pedophilia ring out of pizza parlor in D.C DEMS: Russia is supplying Wikileaks! Ask yourself this question: If the CIA and FBI had evidence of Russian tampering in October, why was nothing said or done until after the election?
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Dec 17, 2016 16:11:26 GMT -7
"Right, and there was a dozen or so women claiming Trump groped and forced himself on them BEFORE the election. Where are they now?" - hoofie
They got their 30 pieces of silver and dismissed.
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Dec 17, 2016 16:13:51 GMT -7
Right, and there was a dozen or so women claiming Trump groped and forced himself on them BEFORE the election. Where are they now? Dems: Comey is trying to win this for Trump! Dems: Comey did the right thing! Dems: Comey is trying to win this for Trump! (Part II) Dems: Comey did the right thing! (Part II) Dems: Fake News! -She’s got Parkinson’s or MS and is covering it up. -She has a body double, whom she trots out when she is too ill to appear in public -She murdered a DNC staffer, among many others -She exchanged “signals” with Lester Holt from the debate stage. -She runs a child pedophilia ring out of pizza parlor in D.C DEMS: Russia is supplying Wikileaks! Ask yourself this question: If the CIA and FBI had evidence of Russian tampering in October, why was nothing said or done until after the election? Nice attempt at deflection hoofie but try to keep up. The story is not about what your "dems" may think it is about what our intelligence services have agreed is true- Putin meddled in our election. However I guess, the FBI, CIA, etc. can't fool you. The U.S. intelligence services must just be partisan stooges making up lies to explain how Clinton seems to have lost the electoral college. Congrats hoofer you and little donnie are too smart to be fooled by all those intelligence pros. Oh, wait, you need to keep up...........Putins little puppet buddy has now changed his story from "never happened" to "Putin did the U.S. a favor and it was good for us to see the hacked info". As for this nonsense "If the CIA and FBI had evidence of Russian tampering in October, why was nothing said or done until after the election?" did you follow any reputable news sources before the election? P.S. Re- false news stories how many of those did you swallow and publicly regurgitate?
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Dec 17, 2016 16:38:08 GMT -7
"Right, and there was a dozen or so women claiming Trump groped and forced himself on them BEFORE the election. Where are they now?" - hoofie They got their 30 pieces of silver and dismissed. I guess you missed the tapes of our lecher in chief basting about sexually assaulting women, right? Or maybe ignoring those sins is how you wingnut xians justify supporting the adulterer in chief.
|
|
|
Post by jiminix on Dec 17, 2016 19:37:53 GMT -7
Ask yourself this question: If the CIA and FBI had evidence of Russian tampering in October, why was nothing said or done until after the election? Such an easy question. First of all, they DID say something about it before the election. So I assume you are just exaggerating for dramatic effect, and that your real question is "Why did they not make as big a deal out of it before the election as after?" Again, an easy question. Democrats didn't think there was any chance Putin/Wikileaks would succeed in making any significant impact on the election. So why add another distraction from the issues of the election when you want the election to be about the issues and not the distractions. I still don't think Putin/Wikileaks was nearly as much of an impact as Comey's dirty trick. Without Comey, Clinton would have sailed to a landslide victory. The public had absorbed the Wikileaks stories and Clinton was still rising in the polls, up to +12% in some of the polls. After all, it's not much of a strike against Clinton that the Democratic party preferred Clinton to Sanders. But when Comey put out his propaganda, Clinton immediately plummeted in the polls. The public gave the FBI Director much more credibility than a bizarre and unaccountable organization like Wikileaks. But, as it turned out, Comey was real liar.
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Dec 17, 2016 21:11:45 GMT -7
"Right, and there was a dozen or so women claiming Trump groped and forced himself on them BEFORE the election. Where are they now?" - hoofie They got their 30 pieces of silver and dismissed. I guess you missed the tapes of our lecher in chief basting about sexually assaulting women, right? Or maybe ignoring those sins is how you wingnut xians justify supporting the adulterer in chief. The only lecher in chief "basting" about sexually assaulting women, was Clinton. This seems to be how you wingnut xians justify supporting the adulterer in chief, or has your memory gone the same route.
|
|
|
Post by ranger06 on Dec 17, 2016 21:16:43 GMT -7
Ask yourself this question: If the CIA and FBI had evidence of Russian tampering in October, why was nothing said or done until after the election? It's called grasping at straws.
|
|
|
Post by hoofie on Dec 18, 2016 7:58:26 GMT -7
Ask yourself this question: If the CIA and FBI had evidence of Russian tampering in October, why was nothing said or done until after the election? Such an easy question. First of all, they DID say something about it before the election. So I assume you are just exaggerating for dramatic effect, and that your real question is "Why did they not make as big a deal out of it before the election as after?" Again, an easy question. Democrats didn't think there was any chance Putin/Wikileaks would succeed in making any significant impact on the election. So why add another distraction from the issues of the election when you want the election to be about the issues and not the distractions. I still don't think Putin/Wikileaks was nearly as much of an impact as Comey's dirty trick. Without Comey, Clinton would have sailed to a landslide victory. The public had absorbed the Wikileaks stories and Clinton was still rising in the polls, up to +12% in some of the polls. After all, it's not much of a strike against Clinton that the Democratic party preferred Clinton to Sanders. But when Comey put out his propaganda, Clinton immediately plummeted in the polls. The public gave the FBI Director much more credibility than a bizarre and unaccountable organization like Wikileaks. But, as it turned out, Comey was real liar. How about: The Obama administration ignored the reports because: A: Hillary was cruising easily for the win and didn't need any surprises. B: The Obama administration wanted Clinton to lose without being blamed for it.
|
|
|
Post by badman on Dec 19, 2016 17:03:47 GMT -7
The latest liberal attempt to jack the will of the people has failed, but we all know it's probably not the last one.
In the meantime, let's try to relax....http://tvadsongs.com/Miller_Beer_-_If_Youve_Got_The_Time.html
|
|
|
Post by jiminix on Dec 19, 2016 21:37:55 GMT -7
The latest liberal attempt to jack the will of the people has failed, but we all know it's probably not the last one. In the meantime, let's try to relax....http://tvadsongs.com/Miller_Beer_-_If_Youve_Got_The_Time.html We know what the "will of the people" was - Clinton beat Trump by 2.8 million votes. Trump will be president, not by the will of the people, but by the peculiarities of the electoral college, our undemocratically skewed system foisted on us by the demands of the original slave states.
|
|