jorj
New Member
Posts: 180
|
Post by jorj on Feb 7, 2017 0:18:23 GMT -7
Where does it say in our constitution that we have to let anyone into our country?
|
|
|
Post by hoofie on Feb 7, 2017 10:09:52 GMT -7
No where. The rights established in the constitution only apply to US citizens.
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Feb 7, 2017 11:31:46 GMT -7
No where. The rights established in the constitution only apply to US citizens.
Obviously we can add the 14th amendment and the concept of legal residency to the many things you haven't heard of or don't understand .
|
|
jorj
New Member
Posts: 180
|
Post by jorj on Feb 7, 2017 13:51:51 GMT -7
Legal residency, green cards, etc can be revolved at any time.
|
|
|
Post by badman on Feb 7, 2017 17:11:59 GMT -7
No where. The rights established in the constitution only apply to US citizens.
Obviously we can add the 14th amendment and the concept of legal residency to the many things you haven't heard of or don't understand . I'm not sure that the coerced 14th amendment intended to extend to new would be immigrants. Clearly it was an amendment to protect the newly freed slaves. On a side note, it appears that former President Obama may have breached section 3.
|
|
|
Post by hoofie on Feb 8, 2017 11:25:56 GMT -7
No where. The rights established in the constitution only apply to US citizens.
Obviously we can add the 14th amendment and the concept of legal residency to the many things you haven't heard of or don't understand . The key word in your statement is legal (residency).
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Feb 8, 2017 18:30:31 GMT -7
Obviously we can add the 14th amendment and the concept of legal residency to the many things you haven't heard of or don't understand . The key word in your statement is legal (residency). I don't know why I keep beating my head against this wall. Your original claim that constitutional protections apply only to U.S citizens is proven false so now you try to spin and expand your claim to include "legal" residents. The truth is-anyone and everyone in the U.S. , legal or illegal, has rights under our constitution. Below are some references you might find educational. As an aside hoofie, I wonder if it is it possible that all those little pocket constitutions handed out by the teabaggers were incomplete or falsely edited? That could explain your lack of understanding of facts pertaining to the actual constitution.
|
|
|
Post by hoofie on Feb 9, 2017 6:45:21 GMT -7
tom-A-to or tom-ah-to
If you're going to try to sound educated by using derogatory labels (teabaggers) you only display your own biases. Lack of respect for others is a trending activity, given the multiple ways we can communicate behind the cloak of a computer monitor or phone screen. Seeing a post with labels decreases the credibility of the content, in my opinion.
I am equally appalled at the time and expense taken by protesters when this time, energy, and expense can be put towards helping the thousands of injured and homeless veterans of our own country. That, Mr. Snakebit really grinds my gears.
|
|
jorj
New Member
Posts: 180
|
Post by jorj on Feb 9, 2017 13:58:30 GMT -7
To me it's really simple. If you are here illegally we as a country have the right to deport you. This renders all other percieved rights moot. So, when we pick you up, say we're sorry for searching you for weapons, handcuff you and ship you back where you came from you cant even birch about it. You have no legal standing.
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Feb 11, 2017 17:11:01 GMT -7
If you're going to try to sound educated by using derogatory labels (teabaggers) you only display your own biases. Lack of respect for others is a trending activity, given the multiple ways we can communicate behind the cloak of a computer monitor or phone screen. Seeing a post with labels decreases the credibility of the content, in my opinion. I am equally appalled at the time and expense taken by protesters when this time, energy, and expense can be put towards helping the thousands of injured and homeless veterans of our own country. That, Mr. Snakebit really grinds my gears. Sorry hoofie but I have to disagree. Do you have any evidence that protesting and supporting our veterans are mutually exclusive activities? As a matter of fact I seem to remember people gathering and protesting wait times and care at VA centers. Are protests not an acceptable way to support veterans? Maybe you need to be more specific about which posters you are unhappy with? Women marching for equal rights, people protesting Betsy DeVoes ignorance and lack of qualifications, people pointing out Sessions bigotry or those protesting your gropenfuehers Muslim ban? How about the right to lifers protesting at Planned parenthood clinics? All the same? tom-A-to or tom-ah-to?
|
|
|
Post by hoofie on Feb 12, 2017 9:32:27 GMT -7
If you're going to try to sound educated by using derogatory labels (teabaggers) you only display your own biases. Lack of respect for others is a trending activity, given the multiple ways we can communicate behind the cloak of a computer monitor or phone screen. Seeing a post with labels decreases the credibility of the content, in my opinion. I am equally appalled at the time and expense taken by protesters when this time, energy, and expense can be put towards helping the thousands of injured and homeless veterans of our own country. That, Mr. Snakebit really grinds my gears. Sorry hoofie but I have to disagree. Do you have any evidence that protesting and supporting our veterans are mutually exclusive activities? As a matter of fact I seem to remember people gathering and protesting wait times and care at VA centers. Are protests not an acceptable way to support veterans? Maybe you need to be more specific about which posters you are unhappy with? Women marching for equal rights, people protesting Betsy DeVoes ignorance and lack of qualifications, people pointing out Sessions bigotry or those protesting your gropenfuehers Muslim ban? How about the right to lifers protesting at Planned parenthood clinics? All the same? tom-A-to or tom-ah-to? Mr. Bit, you missed the point by a mile. Why are the anti-Trump protesters willing to to stop traffic for a foreign refugee, but not a veteran that fought to allow them to keep that right? Why do the anti-Trump protesters want Americans to be extreme vetted to purchase a firearm, but allow an unknown foreign refugee free run in our country? The anti-Trump protesters are just getting their 15 minutes of fame. President Trump is not going to waste a Republican congress shoveling snowflakes like the last administration wasted a filibuster proof Congress for 2 years. Keep on protesting, someone else will take your job. Did you know that it's not illegal to fire someone because of their political affiliation? If I were Trump, I would send all refugees to the states that protested. Kind of put up or shut up. Oh, by the way, your new label....... .........makes you sound uber-intelligent and should be taken seriously.
|
|
|
Post by hoofie on Feb 12, 2017 10:28:06 GMT -7
|
|
|
Post by snakebit on Feb 13, 2017 17:23:31 GMT -7
. Sorry hoofie but I have to disagree. Do you have any evidence that protesting and supporting our veterans are mutually exclusive activities? As a matter of fact I seem to remember people gathering and protesting wait times and care at VA centers. Are protests not an acceptable way to support veterans? Maybe you need to be more specific about which posters you are unhappy with? Women marching for equal rights, people protesting Betsy DeVoes ignorance and lack of qualifications, people pointing out Sessions bigotry or those protesting your gropenfuehers Muslim ban? How about the right to lifers protesting at Planned parenthood clinics? All the same? tom-A-to or tom-ah-to? Mr. Bit, you missed the point by a mile. Why are the anti-Trump protesters willing to to stop traffic for a foreign refugee, but not a veteran that fought to allow them to keep that right? How do you know that the anti- der gropenfueher protestors are not also active in supporting vets rights? Please be specific.Why do the anti-Trump protesters want Americans to be extreme vetted to purchase a firearm, but allow an unknown foreign refugee free run in our country? Apparently this is another area where you are woefully ignorant.
Refugees go through, on average, 18 to 24 months of vetting. The google could be your friend.
I'm also interested in how you know exactly how any group of protestors feel about gun control. Again, please be specific on the source of your knowledge.The anti-Trump protesters are just getting their 15 minutes of fame. President Trump is not going to waste a Republican congress shoveling snowflakes like the last administration wasted a filibuster proof Congress for 2 years. Keep on protesting, someone else will take your job. Did you know that it's not illegal to fire someone because of their political affiliation? You are missing the official Orange party line here, protestors don't have jobs they should get a job. They also get welfare, Obama phones and are paid to protest.
Also you are not using the term "snowflake" as often as you could. It is important we stay in lockstep.
Please try to keep up.
If I were Trump, I would send all refugees to the states that protested. Kind of put up or shut up. Oh, by the way, your new label....... .........makes you sound uber-intelligent and should be taken seriously. Thank you, perhaps you are more perceptive than I thought.You know what I would really be appalled by? The thought that anyone would waste the time and energy to make 15 or 20 thousand posts to insignificant backwoods newspaper forums in order to be the exulted supreme post count leader when they could devote that same time and energy to advocating for our vets. I say "would be appalled" because, unlike you, I don't know what people do with their time when they aren't protesting or posting posting on forums. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt here and assuming you have also sent 15 or 20 thousand missives to elected officials advocating for our veterans. On the other hand if i knew you hadn't sent those missives to elected officials I would certainly be appalled at the time you waste pursuing post count on silly forums.
|
|
jorj
New Member
Posts: 180
|
Post by jorj on Feb 13, 2017 20:27:39 GMT -7
. Mr. Bit, you missed the point by a mile. Why are the anti-Trump protesters willing to to stop traffic for a foreign refugee, but not a veteran that fought to allow them to keep that right? How do you know that the anti- der gropenfueher protestors are not also active in supporting vets rights? Please be specific.Why do the anti-Trump protesters want Americans to be extreme vetted to purchase a firearm, but allow an unknown foreign refugee free run in our country? Apparently this is another area where you are woefully ignorant.
Refugees go through, on average, 18 to 24 months of vetting. The google could be your friend.
I'm also interested in how you know exactly how any group of protestors feel about gun control. Again, please be specific on the source of your knowledge.The anti-Trump protesters are just getting their 15 minutes of fame. President Trump is not going to waste a Republican congress shoveling snowflakes like the last administration wasted a filibuster proof Congress for 2 years. Keep on protesting, someone else will take your job. Did you know that it's not illegal to fire someone because of their political affiliation? You are missing the official Orange party line here, protestors don't have jobs they should get a job. They also get welfare, Obama phones and are paid to protest.
Also you are not using the term "snowflake" as often as you could. It is important we stay in lockstep.
Please try to keep up.
If I were Trump, I would send all refugees to the states that protested. Kind of put up or shut up. Oh, by the way, your new label....... .........makes you sound uber-intelligent and should be taken seriously. Thank you, perhaps you are more perceptive than I thought.You know what I would really be appalled by? The thought that anyone would waste the time and energy to make 15 or 20 thousand posts to insignificant backwoods newspaper forums in order to be the exulted supreme post count leader when they could devote that same time and energy to advocating for our vets. I say "would be appalled" because, unlike you, I don't know what people do with their time when they aren't protesting or posting posting on forums. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt here and assuming you have also sent 15 or 20 thousand missives to elected officials advocating for our veterans. On the other hand if i knew you hadn't sent those missives to elected officials I would certainly be appalled at the time you waste pursuing post count on silly forums. One thing you got correct. You are appalled. And you should be. Someone, like yourself, who speaks ill of others while chastising other for talking ill of others should be appalled. You're just one mixed up muddled appalling mess. Maybe you should go to Bermuda.
|
|
|
Post by hoofie on Feb 14, 2017 5:56:13 GMT -7
I think that went reasonably well, if being dragged into a manure pile by the infamous Snakebit before reaching page 2 is considered doing reasonably well. I don't understand why he professes to know what I do with my time and what I do or don't do for veterans. I almost pity him.
|
|