|
Post by jiminix on May 27, 2017 11:44:23 GMT -7
Remember the outrage from conservatives about Hillary's $12,500 jacket? They kept it up for weeks. And actually, it wasn't a $12500 jacket, the LIST price was $7500 and the actual selling price was $2500. To embellish the story they claimed she wore it while giving a speech on income inequality, which wasn't true.
You'd think that they would be even more outraged by Melania's $51,500 jacket that she was sporting this week in Europe, right? Well, no, they are strangely silent about it. I searched several conservative sites. Most didn't mention it. One of them had a fake story that leftists were having a "meltdown" about the jacket. Breitbart had a story about how Melania had outshone all the other diplomats' wives in the jacket, but didn't mention the price of the jacket.
But then, nobody really expected anything different.
|
|
|
Post by hoofie on May 27, 2017 12:09:38 GMT -7
Newsflash: Melania Trump isn't running for president. She is currently the FLOTUS and has been continually compared to previous ones in the fashion and behavioral sense.
|
|
|
Post by badman on May 27, 2017 12:37:00 GMT -7
Even $2500 is serious money for someone who left the White House "dead broke". What legitimate product or service did the Clintons provide to earn enough money to afford such?
|
|
jorj
New Member
Posts: 180
|
Post by jorj on May 30, 2017 9:17:19 GMT -7
With all due respect for both sides here. What business is it of anyone as to how much a jacket costs. It's their money and they are free to spend it how they wish. Secondly, if you believe Hilary left the whitehouse broke you're being nieve. And even if she did she could make a speech on the nearest street corner and make 2500 bucks.
Lastly.
This us r about he or she spent how much on what. It's about which side is either hitching or not about it.
I ask ya? What damn difference does it make?
|
|
|
Post by badman on May 30, 2017 13:47:00 GMT -7
Not being naive, jorj. Being sarcastic. Those were her words.
|
|
|
Post by forsight on May 30, 2017 16:53:32 GMT -7
With all due respect for both sides here. What business is it of anyone as to how much a jacket costs. It's their money and they are free to spend it how they wish. Secondly, if you believe Hilary left the whitehouse broke you're being nieve. And even if she did she could make a speech on the nearest street corner and make 2500 bucks. Lastly. This us r about he or she spent how much on what. It's about which side is either hitching or not about it. I ask ya? What damn difference does it make? What does nieve mean plus the statement below?
"This us r about he or she how much on what".
|
|
jorj
New Member
Posts: 180
|
Post by jorj on May 31, 2017 4:37:25 GMT -7
Not being naive, jorj. Being sarcastic. Those were her words. Ok, cool. But too many people aren't. I just think there's more important things to think about. Hope you are well. Rough patches for us over here.
|
|
jorj
New Member
Posts: 180
|
Post by jorj on May 31, 2017 4:39:52 GMT -7
With all due respect for both sides here. What business is it of anyone as to how much a jacket costs. It's their money and they are free to spend it how they wish. Secondly, if you believe Hilary left the whitehouse broke you're being nieve. And even if she did she could make a speech on the nearest street corner and make 2500 bucks. Lastly. This us r about he or she spent how much on what. It's about which side is either hitching or not about it. I ask ya? What damn difference does it make? What does nieve mean plus the statement below?
"This us r about he or she how much on what".
Sorry, fat fingers in a hurry This isn't about how much he or she spent on this or that. It's about one side bitching about the other side not bitching about it.
|
|